Pantone to CMYK Converter
Converting Pantone to CMYK turns a single pre-mixed spot ink into a four-colour process build — Pantone 485 C, for example, comes out as C 0 M 81 Y 87 K 15.
Try “485-C”, “Reflex Blue”, “871-C”, “Black-C”, “Cool Gray 11-C”
Search any of the 3,679 PMS colours above to get its cyan, magenta, yellow and black percentages.
Below the tool: a 100-colour PMS to CMYK ink chart with total area coverage and an ink-headroom flag, the 25 builds that lean hardest on the press, what rich black and the 300% ink limit actually mean for your file, how to convert in Illustrator and the InDesign Ink Manager, and when paying for a fifth plate is the cheaper decision.
Pantone to CMYK Conversion Chart — 100 Most-Used PMS Colors
A hundred PMS colours with their four-colour builds: the fourteen base inks the Pantone system mixes from, the deck blacks, the Cool Grays, four speciality colours and sixty-four numbered colours that recur in brand work. It is a hand-picked set, not a popularity ranking, grouped by ink family.
TAC is total area coverage — the four percentages added together. It is the number a prepress operator looks at first, because it decides whether the sheet will dry, and whether a rich black underneath will push the total past what the press allows. Across the whole coated deck the median build lands at 116% and the heaviest, PMS 2738 C, reaches 239%.
Ink headroom flags how hard the recipe leans on the chromatic inks. A build marked “None” drives cyan, magenta or yellow to 95% or more, which means the press has nothing left to give: if the printed sheet comes back short of the target, there is no ink adjustment that fixes it. 312 of the 1,565 coated colours fall into that category. This is a property of the recipe, computed exactly — it is not a measured press ΔE, and the methodology note explains why we do not publish one.
| Pantone colour | C % | M % | Y % | K % | TAC | Ink headroom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMS Yellow C | 0 | 13 | 100 | 0 | 113% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Yellow 012 C | 0 | 16 | 100 | 0 | 116% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Orange 021 C | 0 | 69 | 100 | 0 | 169% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Warm Red C | 0 | 73 | 77 | 2 | 152% | Comfortable |
| PMS Red 032 C | 0 | 79 | 73 | 6 | 158% | Comfortable |
| PMS Rubine Red C | 0 | 100 | 57 | 19 | 176% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Rhodamine Red C | 0 | 100 | 32 | 12 | 144% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Purple C | 0 | 78 | 0 | 27 | 105% | Comfortable |
| PMS Violet C | 56 | 100 | 0 | 40 | 196% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Blue 072 C | 90 | 96 | 0 | 38 | 224% | None — 96% ink |
| PMS Reflex Blue C | 100 | 85 | 0 | 46 | 231% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Process Blue C | 100 | 34 | 0 | 21 | 155% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Green C | 100 | 0 | 23 | 33 | 156% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS Black C | 0 | 9 | 16 | 82 | 107% | Comfortable |
| PMS Black 2 C | 0 | 8 | 35 | 80 | 123% | Comfortable |
| PMS Black 3 C | 15 | 0 | 15 | 85 | 115% | Comfortable |
| PMS Black 4 C | 0 | 22 | 41 | 81 | 144% | Comfortable |
| PMS Black 5 C | 0 | 31 | 26 | 76 | 133% | Comfortable |
| PMS Black 6 C | 50 | 25 | 0 | 87 | 162% | Comfortable |
| PMS Black 7 C | 0 | 7 | 13 | 76 | 96% | Comfortable |
| PMS Neutral Black C | 3 | 3 | 0 | 86 | 92% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 1 C | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 16% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 2 C | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 19% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 3 C | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 4 C | 1 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 27% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 5 C | 1 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 31% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 6 C | 2 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 36% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 7 C | 3 | 1 | 0 | 39 | 43% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 8 C | 4 | 1 | 0 | 45 | 50% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 9 C | 5 | 2 | 0 | 52 | 59% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 10 C | 7 | 4 | 0 | 58 | 69% | Comfortable |
| PMS Cool Gray 11 C | 8 | 4 | 0 | 65 | 77% | Comfortable |
| PMS 871 C | 0 | 11 | 41 | 48 | 100% | Comfortable |
| PMS 877 C | 3 | 1 | 0 | 44 | 48% | Comfortable |
| PMS 8003 C Metallic(metallic) | 0 | 9 | 19 | 46 | 74% | Comfortable |
| PMS 811 C(neon) | 0 | 44 | 58 | 0 | 102% | Comfortable |
| PMS 185 C | 0 | 100 | 81 | 11 | 192% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 186 C | 0 | 92 | 77 | 22 | 191% | Tight — 92% |
| PMS 199 C | 0 | 100 | 77 | 16 | 193% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 200 C | 0 | 94 | 75 | 27 | 196% | Tight — 94% |
| PMS 202 C | 0 | 72 | 62 | 47 | 181% | Comfortable |
| PMS 219 C | 0 | 89 | 39 | 15 | 143% | Tight — 89% |
| PMS 226 C | 0 | 100 | 47 | 18 | 165% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 241 C | 0 | 87 | 24 | 31 | 142% | Tight — 87% |
| PMS 485 C | 0 | 81 | 87 | 15 | 183% | Tight — 87% |
| PMS 1795 C | 0 | 82 | 77 | 18 | 177% | Tight — 82% |
| PMS 151 C | 0 | 49 | 100 | 0 | 149% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 158 C | 0 | 49 | 85 | 9 | 143% | Tight — 85% |
| PMS 165 C | 0 | 60 | 88 | 0 | 148% | Tight — 88% |
| PMS 172 C | 0 | 72 | 91 | 2 | 165% | Tight — 91% |
| PMS 1375 C | 0 | 38 | 89 | 0 | 127% | Tight — 89% |
| PMS 1585 C | 0 | 58 | 93 | 0 | 151% | Tight — 93% |
| PMS 1665 C | 0 | 69 | 98 | 14 | 181% | None — 98% ink |
| PMS 469 C | 0 | 40 | 67 | 59 | 166% | Comfortable |
| PMS 476 C | 0 | 31 | 47 | 69 | 147% | Comfortable |
| PMS 7412 C | 0 | 38 | 75 | 17 | 130% | Comfortable |
| PMS 100 C | 0 | 4 | 61 | 4 | 69% | Comfortable |
| PMS 102 C | 0 | 10 | 100 | 1 | 111% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 109 C | 0 | 18 | 100 | 0 | 118% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 116 C | 0 | 20 | 100 | 0 | 120% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 123 C | 0 | 22 | 83 | 0 | 105% | Tight — 83% |
| PMS 130 C | 0 | 30 | 100 | 5 | 135% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 137 C | 0 | 36 | 100 | 0 | 136% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 872 C | 0 | 15 | 42 | 48 | 105% | Comfortable |
| PMS 7406 C | 0 | 19 | 100 | 5 | 124% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 7548 C | 0 | 22 | 100 | 0 | 122% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 347 C | 100 | 0 | 56 | 40 | 196% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 348 C | 100 | 0 | 54 | 48 | 202% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 354 C | 100 | 0 | 64 | 31 | 195% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 355 C | 100 | 0 | 62 | 41 | 203% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 356 C | 100 | 0 | 58 | 52 | 210% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 368 C | 37 | 0 | 83 | 25 | 145% | Tight — 83% |
| PMS 375 C | 30 | 0 | 100 | 16 | 146% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 382 C | 8 | 0 | 100 | 16 | 124% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 3405 C | 100 | 0 | 42 | 31 | 173% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 7482 C | 100 | 0 | 52 | 38 | 190% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 279 C | 71 | 36 | 0 | 13 | 120% | Comfortable |
| PMS 285 C | 100 | 45 | 0 | 19 | 164% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 286 C | 100 | 68 | 0 | 37 | 205% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 287 C | 100 | 64 | 0 | 47 | 211% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 293 C | 100 | 63 | 0 | 35 | 198% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 300 C | 100 | 49 | 0 | 28 | 177% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 301 C | 100 | 44 | 0 | 47 | 191% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 306 C | 100 | 20 | 0 | 11 | 131% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 2955 C | 100 | 45 | 0 | 60 | 205% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 7461 C | 100 | 33 | 0 | 27 | 160% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 265 C | 30 | 52 | 0 | 20 | 102% | Comfortable |
| PMS 266 C | 38 | 69 | 0 | 26 | 133% | Comfortable |
| PMS 267 C | 40 | 77 | 0 | 38 | 155% | Comfortable |
| PMS 2685 C | 55 | 100 | 0 | 55 | 210% | None — 100% ink |
| PMS 2725 C | 48 | 54 | 0 | 22 | 124% | Comfortable |
| PMS 527 C | 23 | 71 | 0 | 35 | 129% | Comfortable |
| PMS 668 C | 20 | 38 | 0 | 53 | 111% | Comfortable |
| PMS 7679 C | 34 | 53 | 0 | 49 | 136% | Comfortable |
| PMS 402 C | 0 | 4 | 10 | 38 | 52% | Comfortable |
| PMS 405 C | 0 | 8 | 16 | 59 | 83% | Comfortable |
| PMS 408 C | 0 | 7 | 11 | 41 | 59% | Comfortable |
| PMS 418 C | 2 | 0 | 11 | 67 | 80% | Comfortable |
| PMS 424 C | 3 | 0 | 1 | 55 | 59% | Comfortable |
| PMS 430 C | 13 | 5 | 0 | 44 | 62% | Comfortable |
Metallic and neon rows are marked. Four-colour process cannot reproduce either — see “Which Pantone colours cannot be reproduced in CMYK” below.
Coated vs Uncoated CMYK Breakdowns
The C and U suffixes are not a labelling convention — they have two different approximate reference values, so they convert to two different builds. Pantone 186 C and Pantone 186 U are the same ink on two papers, and the uncoated printing is lighter and duller because the fibre drinks the vehicle and scatters the light. Ask any converter for “186” without a suffix and you are letting it choose for you.
| PMS colour | Coated build | TAC | C vs U difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMS 186 C | C 0 M 92 Y 77 K 22 | 191% | ΔE 11.74 — uncoated prints lighter and much duller. |
| PMS 485 C | C 0 M 81 Y 87 K 15 | 183% | ΔE 10.83 — uncoated prints lighter and much duller. |
| PMS Reflex Blue C | C 100 M 85 Y 0 K 46 | 231% | ΔE 14.61 — uncoated prints lighter and much duller. |
| PMS 300 C | C 100 M 49 Y 0 K 28 | 177% | ΔE 6.35 — uncoated prints lighter and much duller. |
| PMS 355 C | C 100 M 0 Y 62 K 41 | 203% | ΔE 6.59 — uncoated prints about as light and much duller. |
| PMS Black C | C 0 M 9 Y 16 K 82 | 107% | ΔE 17.32 — uncoated prints lighter and similarly saturated. |
Why uncoated needs different ink percentages
The reason is dot gain. A halftone dot printed on uncoated stock spreads as the ink wicks into the fibres, so a 50% tint on the plate can measure 70% or more on the sheet. Coated stock holds the dot much closer to its intended size. That is why press profiles for uncoated work carry a different tone curve and a lower total ink limit — a build that was engineered against a coated profile prints darker, muddier and flatter on uncoated paper if nobody re-separates it.
Two practical consequences. First, convert the variant your brand sheet names rather than the bare number. Second, if the same brand colour is going onto both coated and uncoated stock in the same campaign, expect two different builds and say so in the guidelines — chasing one build across both papers is how colour arguments start. The coated vs uncoated guide covers the paper side in more depth, and the Pantone to HEX converter shows the same split on the screen side.
Which Pantone Colors Cannot Be Reproduced in CMYK
Four-colour process describes a smaller set of colours than the Pantone library does. That is not a defect in anyone’s software; it is arithmetic. A spot colour is one pre-mixed pigment laid down as a solid film at full strength, and the ink maker can reach for whatever pigment the colour needs. A process build has four transparent inks and a halftone screen, and every colour it can produce lies inside the volume those four inks can mix. Anything outside that volume gets pulled to the nearest point on its surface.
The colours that never survive
- Metallics. Pantone 871 C, 872 C, 877 C and the whole 8000 series work by suspending aluminium or bronze flake, which reflects light directionally so the colour shifts as the sheet moves. Process inks contain no metal. Pantone 877 C converts to C 3 M 1 Y 0 K 44 — a flat grey with no reflection in it at all.
- Fluorescents. The 800-series neons re-emit ultraviolet as visible light, so they are literally brighter than the white paper around them. No combination of four subtractive inks can be brighter than the substrate.
- The saturated corners. Orange 021, Red 032, Reflex Blue, Blue 072, the 265 and 266 violets and the 354 and 355 greens all sit outside or right on the edge of what process can reach. They do not disappear — they arrive duller and slightly shifted in hue, which is worse, because it looks like a printing mistake rather than an obvious limitation.
Ranking the difficult builds
The table below ranks the coated deck by ink headroom: how many of cyan, magenta and yellow the build drives to 95% or more, then by total ink coverage. It is exact arithmetic on the approximate CMYK build. A build with an ink at 100% is a build the press cannot push any further, so if the printed sheet comes back short of target, the only remaining lever is black — which darkens the colour rather than saturating it.
Deep blues dominate the top of this list, and that is genuinely informative rather than an artefact. Colours like Reflex Blue and the 2740s need cyan at 100%, heavy magenta and 45–60% black simultaneously: the recipe is asking for a chroma the inks cannot deliver, and the black is doing the work that saturation should. That is precisely why those colours print as flat, slightly grey navies in process and look electric as spot inks.
| PMS colour | Spot HEX | Process build | TAC | Inks at 95%+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMS 2738 C | #06038D | C 96 · M 98 · Y 0 · K 45 | 239% | 2 |
| PMS 2748 C | #001871 | C 100 · M 79 · Y 0 · K 56 | 235% | 1 |
| PMS 662 C | #001A70 | C 100 · M 77 · Y 0 · K 56 | 233% | 1 |
| PMS 2747 C | #001A72 | C 100 · M 77 · Y 0 · K 55 | 232% | 1 |
| PMS 2758 C | #001E62 | C 100 · M 69 · Y 0 · K 62 | 231% | 1 |
| PMS 2757 C | #001E60 | C 100 · M 69 · Y 0 · K 62 | 231% | 1 |
| PMS Reflex Blue C | #001489 | C 100 · M 85 · Y 0 · K 46 | 231% | 1 |
| PMS 281 C | #00205B | C 100 · M 65 · Y 0 · K 64 | 229% | 1 |
| PMS 280 C | #012169 | C 99 · M 69 · Y 0 · K 59 | 227% | 1 |
| PMS Blue 072 C | #10069F | C 90 · M 96 · Y 0 · K 38 | 224% | 1 |
| PMS 655 C | #002554 | C 100 · M 56 · Y 0 · K 67 | 223% | 1 |
| PMS 2745 C | #280071 | C 65 · M 100 · Y 0 · K 56 | 221% | 1 |
| PMS 295 C | #002855 | C 100 · M 53 · Y 0 · K 67 | 220% | 1 |
| PMS 6413 C | #017F27 | C 99 · M 0 · Y 69 · K 50 | 218% | 1 |
| PMS Dark Blue C | #00239C | C 100 · M 78 · Y 0 · K 39 | 217% | 1 |
| PMS 288 C | #002D72 | C 100 · M 61 · Y 0 · K 55 | 216% | 1 |
| PMS 648 C | #002E5D | C 100 · M 51 · Y 0 · K 64 | 215% | 1 |
| PMS 2965 C | #00263E | C 100 · M 39 · Y 0 · K 76 | 215% | 1 |
| PMS 294 C | #002F6C | C 100 · M 56 · Y 0 · K 58 | 214% | 1 |
| PMS 6406 C | #016A2F | C 99 · M 0 · Y 56 · K 58 | 213% | 1 |
| PMS 2735 C | #2E008B | C 67 · M 100 · Y 0 · K 45 | 212% | 1 |
| PMS 7463 C | #002B49 | C 100 · M 41 · Y 0 · K 71 | 212% | 1 |
| PMS 287 C | #003087 | C 100 · M 64 · Y 0 · K 47 | 211% | 1 |
| PMS 540 C | #003057 | C 100 · M 45 · Y 0 · K 66 | 211% | 1 |
| PMS 539 C | #00263A | C 100 · M 34 · Y 0 · K 77 | 211% | 1 |
How Much Ink a Pantone Build Actually Puts on the Sheet
Total area coverage decides whether a job dries, offsets or cracks at the fold, and it is the first number a prepress operator checks. This chart sorts every one of the 1,565 coated PMS builds into coverage bands.
The takeaway: a single Pantone build is never the thing that breaks your ink limit. The median build is 116% and the mean is 112.97%. Only 53 builds — 3.4% of the deck — exceed 200%, and the heaviest in the whole coated library, PMS 2738 C, reaches 239%. Nothing here comes close to the ~300% limit of commercial sheetfed work.
What breaks the limit is stacking. Drop a 239% build on top of a 240% rich black, or knock one colour out of another with a trap, and the total on that spot is what the press has to dry. The number to watch is not the swatch in your palette — it is the heaviest square millimetre of the finished artwork, which is what a preflight ink-coverage check reports.
Ink Build Comparison — Eight Colours Side by Side
Two builds can carry the same total coverage and behave completely differently on press, because what matters is which inks are doing the work. These eight bars show the composition rather than the total.
The takeaway: the heavy builds are heavy because of black, not because of colour. Pantone Yellow C is a 113% build made almost entirely of one ink — clean, cheap and easy to hold on press. Pantone Reflex Blue C runs to 231% with cyan at 100%, magenta at 85% and black at 46%. That black is not adding depth, it is compensating: the chromatic inks have run out and the recipe is darkening the colour to get it close.
Compare Pantone 186 C at 191% and Pantone 485 C at 183% — two similar reds with different balances. 186 leans on magenta (92% against 81%), 485 on yellow, which is exactly why 186 reads as the cooler, more crimson red and 485 as the warmer, more orange one. And Pantone Black C is only 107%: a warm black built from 82% K plus a little magenta and yellow, which is why it never matches a flat 100% K.
Rich Black, Total Ink Limit and Press Reality
A solid area of 100% K alone looks disappointing — washed out, slightly mottled, obviously thinner than the black you had in mind. The fix is a rich black: 100% K with one or more chromatic inks printed underneath to deepen it. A common commercial recipe is 60C 40M 40Y 100K, which totals 240% coverage. A cooler variant drops the yellow; a warmer one leads with magenta.
The constraint is the total ink limit, the maximum coverage the press and stock will carry before the sheet stops behaving. Roughly: commercial sheetfed offset on coated stock sits around 300%, heatset web around 300%, uncoated work lower still, and coldset newsprint as low as 240%. Exceed it and you get set-off — wet ink transferring onto the back of the next sheet — along with slow drying, cracking at the fold and plugged shadows where detail should be.
Those limits are baked into the standard profiles rather than being universal truths. U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2 targets American web offset. GRACoL 2006 and its successors target American sheetfed on premium coated stock, with a heavier ink limit and a different grey balance. Coated FOGRA39 and FOGRA51 target the European ISO 12647-2 condition, FOGRA51 assuming paper with optical brighteners. The same Pantone number converted against each of those produces a different build. This is why the useful question to a printer is never “what is the CMYK”, it is “which profile should I convert against”.
Two rules that prevent most reprints
- Never set small text in rich black. Four plates cannot stay in perfect register at speed, and 9pt type built from four inks arrives fringed with cyan or magenta. Body copy is 100% K, always. Save the rich black for areas large enough that a fraction of a millimetre of misregistration is invisible.
- Check the artwork, not the swatch. Individual Pantone builds are modest — the heaviest in the coated deck is 239% — but they stack. Run an ink-coverage preflight on the finished file and look at the worst spot, which is usually where a heavy colour overlaps a rich-black panel.
And on Process Black specifically: the K ink on a four-colour press is Process Black, so specifying it means 100% K by definition. Pantone Black C is a different ink entirely — a warm spot black whose build, C 0 M 9 Y 16 K 82, carries magenta and yellow precisely because it is not the process ink. The two are not interchangeable, and the Pantone black comparison page shows all seven deck blacks together.
How to Convert Pantone to CMYK in Illustrator and InDesign
The converter above gives you the numbers. Inside a real document you usually want the application to do the conversion, so that every object using the colour changes together and nothing is left behind on a stray spot plate.
Converting Pantone swatches to CMYK in Illustrator
Illustrator will convert one swatch, a selection, or the whole document, and the three routes behave differently enough to matter.
- To convert one swatch permanently: double-click it in the Swatches panel, change Color Type from Spot Color to Process Color, set Color Mode to CMYK, and click OK. Everything using that swatch updates.
- To convert a selection only: select the objects, then choose Edit, then Edit Colors, then Convert to CMYK. This rewrites the fills in place and leaves the spot swatch in the panel.
- To convert everything at output: choose Window, then Output, then Separations Preview, tick Overprint Preview, and check which plates are still listed. Any spot plate you did not intend shows up here.
- Load the right book before you start. Choose Window, then Swatch Libraries, then Color Books, then PANTONE+ Solid Coated for a C number or PANTONE+ Solid Uncoated for a U number — Illustrator derives the process build from whichever book the swatch came from.
- Set the document CMYK profile deliberately under Edit, then Assign Profile. A build converted against U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) is not the same build as one converted against Coated FOGRA39.
Converting Pantone to CMYK in InDesign with the Ink Manager
InDesign has the better tool for this, because the Ink Manager converts at export without touching your swatches — so the file stays correct if the job goes back to spot.
- Open Window, then Output, then Ink Manager. Every ink the document will separate onto its own plate is listed here, including spot inks arriving inside placed EPS and PDF artwork.
- Tick “All Spots to Process” at the bottom of the dialog. The spot plates disappear from the list and the colours will output as process builds.
- Leave the swatches themselves alone. Because the change lives in the Ink Manager rather than in the swatch definitions, you can untick it later and the spot colours come back intact.
- Use the alias column instead when two spot swatches are really the same ink — for example a supplied logo carrying “PANTONE 186 C” and your own “Brand Red”. Aliasing them merges the plates and saves a plate charge.
- Check the result in Window, then Output, then Separations Preview before you export, and again in the exported PDF, since placed artwork can reintroduce a spot plate.
Spot vs Process — When to Pay for the Extra Plate
A fifth plate costs money: an extra plate, an extra unit on the press or an extra pass, extra make-ready, extra wash-up. Whether it is worth it is a real decision with a real answer, and it is not “always use spot for brand colours”.
Pay for the plate when
- The colour covers a large area — a cover, a bag, a pack face. A process build that is slightly off is obvious across a big flat, and invisible in a small logo.
- The colour is the brand and customers recognise it from across a shop. Some reds and some blues are load-bearing in a way that a 6% hue shift genuinely damages.
- Our chart flags the build as having no ink headroom. Those are the colours a press operator cannot chase, so a proof that comes back short cannot be corrected on the day.
- The job is short-run and simple — a two-colour letterhead runs cheaper as two spot plates than as four process plates, not more expensive.
- The substrate is unusual. Uncoated, kraft and coloured stock all pull process builds around far more than they pull a solid spot ink.
Take the process build when
- The artwork already needs full-colour photography. The four plates are on the press regardless, so the brand colour rides along free.
- The colour appears small — a footer logo, a spine, an icon. Nobody compares a stamp-sized mark against a swatch book.
- The colour is comfortably inside process reach. Most mid-tone corporate blues, greens and neutrals convert with a shift nobody notices.
- The run is digital. Most digital presses are CMYK-only and cannot take a spot plate at all, though some offer extended gamut with orange, green and violet units.
The middle route worth knowing about is extended-gamut printing — CMYK plus orange, green and violet, run as a fixed seven-colour set. It reaches a large share of the Pantone library without a job-specific spot plate, which makes it attractive for packaging runs carrying many brands at once. Ask your printer whether they run it before you assume the choice is binary.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where These Numbers Come From — and What They Are Not
Every percentage on this page is read from this site’s Pantone dataset, which holds 3,679 colours across the coated, uncoated, metallic, pastel-and-neon, Colour of the Year and skin-tone libraries. Derived figures — total area coverage, the ink-headroom counts, the two charts — are computed at build time by scripts/build-color-stats.mjs and written to a JSON file this page imports, so anyone can re-run the script and get the same numbers. No value is entered by hand and no row appears for a colour the dataset does not contain.
Colour differences quoted anywhere on this page use CIEDE2000 as formulated by Sharma, Wu and Dalal (2005) with kL = kC = kH = 1, on Lab values converted from sRGB through CIE XYZ under the D65 illuminant and the 2° standard observer. Total area coverage is simply C + M + Y + K. Ink headroom is the count of cyan, magenta and yellow at 95% or above.
Ink builds and coverage figures on this page were last recomputed from the dataset on ; this converter has been online since .